Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Christopher Heyman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Heyman analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Christopher Heyman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wild 1 - 0 Heyman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 49.3% of points on their second serve, while Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 51.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 39/ 30), with Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 192/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.93% of matches (W/L 11/ 18), where as Heyman has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wild winning 1 times and Heyman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Wild winning 2 and Heyman winning 1. The last match between Wild and Heyman was at the Poland F7 (Bydgoszcz), 17-08-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 4-6 6-0 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Heyman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wild winning 1 times and Heyman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 1, and Heyman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.68 while Heyman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 42.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
74
Rank
58
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
57% (227-173)
Career Total W/L
64% (352-201)
50% (18-18)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$691,720
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Christopher Heyman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wild VS Heyman
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:45:0 | 2:45:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (50/82) | 63% (59/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (39/50) | 54% (32/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (13/32) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (43/94) | 37% (30/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Christopher Heyman
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (18/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (46/42) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (421/411) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 177 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 104 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.83 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1708/2714) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1194/1708) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (496/1006) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (92/215) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (901/2506) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (18/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
15
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
42 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
5 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Gregoire Barrere
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Heyman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wild are available here and Heyman photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Thiago Seyboth Wild
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
